​​​​​International Journal of Modern Science and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2017, Pages 193-200.


Performance of Pt–Ru–Ni/MC ternary electrocatalyst on methanol oxidation reaction in membraneless fuel cells  

P. Ramar¹, M. Chitralekha²
¹Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College, Ariyalur - 621 713, India.                       

²Department of Chemistry, D G Government Arts College, Mayiladuthurai, India. 

*Corresponding author’s e-mail: chitralekhaprof@yahoo.com

In the present work, mesoporous carbon (MC) supported Pt–Ni, Pt–Ru, and Pt–Ru–Ni electrocatalysts with different atomic ratios were synthesized by NaBH4 reduction method to study the electro-oxidation of methanol in a MLMFC. The synthesized electrocatalysts were characterized by TEM, EDX and XRD analyses. The Pt metal was the predominant material in all the samples, with peaks attributed to the face-centered cubic (fcc) crystalline structure. The TEM analysis indicated that the prepared catalysts had similar particle morphology, and their particle sizes were 3–5 nm. The electrocatalytic activities of the synthesized electrocatalysts were characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (CA). During the experiments performed on single membraneless fuel cells, Pt50Ru40Ni10/MC performed better among all the catalysts prepared with power density of 38.1 mW cm−2. The enhanced methanol oxidation activity by Ni in Pt50Ru40Ni10/MC can be attributed to the electronic effect as the result of the modification of electronic properties of Pt and the various oxidation states of Ni. In our work, for the first-time mesoporous carbon-supported binary Pt–Ru, Pt–Ni and ternary Pt–Ru–Ni anode catalysts were successfully tested in a single membraneless fuel cell using 1.0 M methanol as the fuel and 0.1 M sodium percarbonate as the oxidant in the presence of 0.5 M H2SO4 as the electrolyte at room temperature.

​​Keywords: Mesoporous carbon; Platinum; Nickel; Ruthenium; Methanol; Catalysts.


  1. Vijayaramalingam K, Kiruthika S and Muthukumaran B. Promoting Effect of Third Metal (M = Ni, Mo and Rh) on Pd–Ir Binary Alloy Catalysts in Membraneless Sodium Perborate Fuel Cells. International Journal of Modern Science and Technology. 2016; 3(7):257–263.
  2. Kalaikathir SPR, Begila David S. Synthesis and characterization of nanostructured carbon-supported Pt electrocatalysts for membraneless methanol fuel cells. International Journal of Modern Science and Technology. 2016;1(6):199–212
  3. Biegler T, Rand DAJ and Woods R, Limiting oxygen coverage on platinized platinum; Relevance to determination of real platinum area by hydrogen adsorption. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 1971;29(2):269-277.
  4. Bonesi A, Moreno MS, Triaca WE and Castro Luna AM. Modified catalytic materials for ethanol oxidation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35(11):5999-6004.
  5. Cao J, Du C, Wang SC, Mercier P, Zhang X, Yang H. The production of a high loading of almost monodispersed Pt nanoparticles on single-walled carbon nanotubes for methanol oxidation. Electrochem. Commun. 2007;9(4):735–740.
  6. Liu H, Song C, Zhang L, Zhang J, Wang H, Wilkinson DP. A review of anode catalysis in the direct methanol fuel cell. J. Power Sources. 2006;155(2):95-102.
  7. Mukerjee S, Lee SJ, Ticcianelli E, McBreen J, Grur BN, Markovic NM. Investigation of enhanced CO tolerance in proton exchange membrane fuel cells by carbon supported PtMo alloy catalyst. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 1999;2(1):12-19.
  8. Neto AO, Franco EG, Arico E, Linardi M, Gonzalez ER, Electro-oxidation of methanol and ethanol on Pt-Ru/C and Pt-Ru-Mo/C electrocatalyst prepared by bonnemann’s method. J. of the European  Ceramic Society. 2003; 23(15): 2987-2992.
  9. Oetjen HF, Schmidt VM, Stimming U, Trila F. Performance data of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell using H2/CO as fuel gas. J Electrochem. Soc. 1996;143: 3838-3842.
  10. Gotz M, Wendt H. Binary and ternary anode catalyst formulations including the elements W, Sn and Mo for PEMFCs operated on methanol or reformate gas. Electrochimica Acta. 1998;43(24):3637-3644.
  11. Beyhan S, Leger J-M, Kadırgan F. Pronounced synergetic effect of the nano-sized PtSnNi/C catalyst for methanol oxidation in direct methanol fuel cell. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2013;130:305–313.
  12. Radmilovic V, Gasteiger HA, Ross Jr. PN. Structure and chemical composition of a supported Pt-Ru electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation. J Catal. 1995;154(1):98-106.
  13. Rashidi R, Dincer I, Naterer GF, Berg P. Performance evaluation of direct methanol fuel cells for portable applications. J. Power Sources. 2009;187(2):509-515.
  14. Zhou Z, Wang S, Zhou W, Wang G, Jiang L, Li W. Pt based anode catalysts for direct ethanol fuel cell. Chem. Commun. 2003;46(4):394–395.
  15. Watanabe M, Motoo S. Electrocatalysis by ad-atoms: Part XXIII, Design of platinum ad-electrodes for formic acid fuel cells with ad-atoms of the IVth and the Vth groups. J Electroanal Chem. 1988;250(1):117–125.
  16. Cooper JS, McGinn PJ. Combinatorial screening of thin film electrocatalysts for a direct methanol fuel cell anode. J Power Sources. 2006;163(1):330–338.
  17. Choi SM, Kim JH, Jung JY, Yoon EY, Kim WB. Pt nanowires prepared via a polymer template method: Its promise toward high Pt-loaded electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation. Electrochimica Acta. 2008;53(19):5804–5811.
  18. Priya M, Elumalai M, Kiruthika S and Muthukumaran B. Influences of supporting materials for Pt-Ru binary catalyst in Ethanol fuel cell, International Journal of Modern Science and Technology. 2016;1(1):5–11.
  19. Mahendran S, Anbuselvan C. Kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of 5-(4’-bromophenyl)-5-oxopentanoic acid by acid permanganate. International Journal of Modern Science and Technology. 2016;3(1):106–110.

International Journal of Modern Science and Technology


ISSN 2456-0235